The Jewellery of widow María Antonia Gonzaga

 
Francisco de Goya, 1746 Fuendetodos, Zaragoza – 1828 Bordeaux / María Antonia Gonzaga, Marchioness widow of Villafranca (María Antonia Gonzaga, marquesa viuda de Villafranca) c.1795 / Oil on canvas / Collection: Museo Nacional del Prado / © Photographic Archive, Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid

Francisco de Goya’s portrait captures a small woman with a strong character — one can imagine her maintaining decisive control of her family’s fortunes. Her white shawl, ribbons and rose reveal a new softness and delicacy in vogue as fashions now took their lead from France.

‘For this image of the marchioness, Goya has avoided the conventional model of a stately and formal full-length portrait of a lady standing in the midst of her properties. Rather, this threequarter length portrait presents the sitter in an intimate light, seated on an austere, though elegant, chair with a gilt frame in the style of the reign of Charles IV. The refined elegance of her dress is reflective of the French-influenced styles then in fashion and includes elements that were typical feminine adornments at the time, such as the blue silk cockade she wears in her large powdered wig, her rose brooch, and the blue ribbon tied around her white shawl. The play of light on the shawl’s slightly transparent chiffon allows Goya — utilising the devices of Venetian painters like Titian — to highlight the marchioness’s delicate intelligent features and sensitive, reflexive facial expression.’ 1

During the 1700’s the sublime gave way to the delightful, the dignified to the graceful, grandeur of size to the charm of elegance. Along with an increased regard for women — the expression of tenderness and feelings became more important.

Diamonds were by now mined in Brazil and the quantities imported had increased 10 times the amount as in the last years of Indian production. An early form of the brilliant cut had been invented — there was a whole new sparkle to the jewellery trade.

No more heavy gold settings or straight rows of gems — a new lightness permeated. Diamonds were now set in silver to best show off their whiteness — and as the settings became lighter, metal was relegated to a supporting role. These airy designs expressed the new naturalism — stones were set at varying angles rather than face on to the viewer — with the result of even more sparkle as the wearer moved.

Improvements in lighting became widespread and the wealthy now owned daytime and evening jewellery — diamonds became synonymous with glittering ballrooms and sparkling conversation across candelabra laden dinner tables.

Barbara Heath is a Brisbane-based jewellery designer

Endnote
1 You can read more about María Antonia Gonzaga by Manuela Mena Marques in the illustrated exhibition catalogue Portrait of Spain: Masterpieces from the Prado.

Know Brisbane through the Collection / Read more about the Australian Collection / Subscribe to QAGOMA YouTube to go behind-the-scenes

Specially curated for the Queensland Art Gallery by the Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid, ‘Portrait of Spain: Masterpieces from the Prado’ is the largest and most significant international loan the Prado has ever undertaken, and the first exhibition from their collection to be shown in the Southern Hemisphere / Queensland Art Gallery / 21 July – 4 November 2012

#QAGOMA

The Jewellery of Tomás de Iriarte

 
Joaquín Inza 1736, Ágreda, Soria – 1811, Madrid / Portrait of Tomás de Iriarte c.1780–85 / Oil on canvas / Collection: Museo Nacional del Prado / © Photographic Archive, Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid

The poet, playwright and composer Tomás de Iriarte (1750–91) who appears to be around 35 in this portrait wears a hard stone cameo on his little finger — two centuries on from Clara Eugenia’s symbol of dynastic continuity this would have a different reading. People are tired now of the bizarre flourishes of the Rococo Period which have come to represent everything excessive about the ancient regime and are drawn to the clarity of Classical Antiquity after the excavations of Pompei in the mid 1700’s and the subsequent illustrations in literature describing travel to classical sites. After all, the values of the enlightenment were partly drawn from Roman History — virtue, tolerance, freedom equality and brotherhood. The classical heroes often depicted in these carved gems embodied these ideals.

Tomás de Iriarte, the moralist, satirist and the intellectual wears an emblem of Neo-Classicism and declares a love of humanist ideals here on his little finger, the lovers finger.

In this painting ‘he sports a greyish wig with a ponytail that can be seen in shadow, falling down his back, and wears a navy blue coat and red waistcoat in which he hides his right hand as was fashionable at the time. Both garments are trimmed with a palmate motif in gold, and his shirt is adorned with lace ruffles on the front and at the wrists. This is the uniform corresponding to his post as the archivist of the Supreme Council of War, a position he held from 1776. In the lower left-hand corner is a table on which an inkwell with two pens, a folded sheet of paper and a book are placed, attributes that allude to his vocation as a translator, poet and playwright. His great passion for music is indicated by the book he holds upright with his left hand, the title of which is legible on the spine: La música, poema (Music, a poem), a didactic work in verse Iriarte published in 1779 and which led to immediate international recognition. Likewise, the ring on his pinkie finger bearing a cameo may possibly refer to his nickname, Camafeo (‘cameo’) with which his friend the Marquis of Manca, Don Manuel Delitala, christened him, owing to a gesture that Iriarte made when he played the violin.’ 1

Barbara Heath is a Brisbane-based jewellery designer

Endnote
1 You can read more about Tomás de Iriarte by Virginia Albarrán Martín in the exhibition catalogue Portrait of Spain: Masterpieces from the Prado.

Know Brisbane through the Collection / Read more about the Australian Collection / Subscribe to QAGOMA YouTube to go behind-the-scenes

Specially curated for the Queensland Art Gallery by the Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid, ‘Portrait of Spain: Masterpieces from the Prado’ is the largest and most significant international loan the Prado has ever undertaken, and the first exhibition from their collection to be shown in the Southern Hemisphere / Queensland Art Gallery / 21 July – 4 November 2012

#QAGOMA

The jewellery of Empress Margarita of Austria

 
Juan Bautista Martínez del Mazo, c.1611, Cuenca – 1667, Madrid / Empress Margarita of Austria (La emperatriz Margarita de Austria) 1665–66 / Oil on canvas / Collection: Museo Nacional del Prado / © Photographic Archive, Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid

‘Margarita was born on 12 July 1651, the daughter of Philip IV and Mariana of Austria. On 12 December 1666, she married Emperor Leopold of Austria and died seven years later in Vienna. The fact that the princess is wearing mourning dress in this painting helps date it between September 1665 — when her father died — and her wedding in December 1666. Those dates suggest that the portrait was made in order to keep a memento in Madrid that would represent the infanta as she appeared shortly before she left permanently for Vienna.’ 1

Margarita would travel shortly after this portrait was painted to marry — as stipulated by her father — to ensure the succession of the Spanish throne would pass to her descendants. Despite the age difference they had a happy marriage and shared an interest in the theatre and music — they had four children, however Margarita died at 21.

Here she wears jet bracelets, rings and large earrings or hair ornaments of black ribbon — her siblings in similar sober attire in the background.

Margarita effectively became Queen of Germany and she would have had a lavish collection of jewellery as part of her dowry. One enormous diamond of 36cts was auctioned at Christies in 2008. The blue diamond sold for 24.3 million, the highest price paid for a diamond at auction. Purchased by London jeweller Laurence Graff who raised eyebrows when he re-cut the gem losing 4.45 cts and indeterminable historical significance, although it resulted in a diamond of technically higher calibre.

Barbara Heath is a Brisbane-based jewellery designer

Endnote
1 You can read more about Empress Margarita of Austria by Javier Portús in the illustrated exhibition catalogue Portrait of Spain: Masterpieces from the Prado.

Know Brisbane through the Collection / Read more about the Australian Collection / Subscribe to QAGOMA YouTube to go behind-the-scenes

Specially curated for the Queensland Art Gallery by the Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid, ‘Portrait of Spain: Masterpieces from the Prado’ is the largest and most significant international loan the Prado has ever undertaken, and the first exhibition from their collection to be shown in the Southern Hemisphere / Queensland Art Gallery / 21 July – 4 November 2012

#QAGOMA

The jewellery of Infanta Isabella Clara Eugenia

 
Alonso Sánchez Coello and workshop, Benifairó de les Valls, Valencia c.1531 – 1588, Madrid / The infanta Isabella Clara Eugenia and Magdalena Ruiz (La infanta Isabel Clara Eugenia y Magdalena Ruiz) c.1585-88 / Oil on canvas / Collection: Museo Nacional del Prado / © Photographic Archive, Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid

Infanta Isabella Clara Eugenia (1566–1633), Philip II’s elder daughter and one of the most important women in the Spanish dynasty can be seen here dressed in her stiff bodice dripping with jewels from her mother and her stepmother. She wears a formal dress made of white silk, heavily embroidered with gold thread; the high collar with its delicate lace trim and the feathered headdress each correspond to Spanish fashion in the mid to late 1580s.

Isabella Clara Eugenia represents the wealth of the Spanish Court, which by the mid 16th Century, enriched by the New World and its gold and emeralds, was leading Europe into its last great epoch of formal ostentatious display in which the art of jewellery played such an important role.

There are three important aspects to the context of this painting: the artistic and intellectual revolutions of the Renaissance; the techniques of rendering a more natural reality applied as much to jewellery as other art forms; and, a time of discovery on a global scale.

Christopher Columbus reached America in 1492, then Vasco de Gama sailed around the Cape of Good Hope in 1497 to new lands and new riches. In the 1500’s the centuries old conduit for precious goods travelling from the east to the west — The Silk Road — was overthrown by these new sea routes to the gem rich countries of Ceylon, Burma and India, shifting the centres of trade in luxury goods from Venice to Seville and Lisbon.

There was enormous potential for jewellery with the new materials and new styles — but equally significant was the recent development of the printing press — this really was an information revolution enabling designs to be distributed throughout the goldsmiths workshops of Europe.

Isabella Clara Eugenia  uses her jewellery — in no subtle way — to display power and status — the sumptuous necklaces inherited from her mothers family re-enforce her matrilineal power base, while the hard stone cameo she holds in her right hand is a portrait of her father Philip II — presents the viewer with a strong sense of dynastic continuity.

Barbara Heath is a Brisbane-based jewellery designer

You can read more about The infanta Isabella Clara Eugenia by Leticia Ruiz Gómez in the richly illustrated exhibition catalogue Portrait of Spain: Masterpieces from the Prado.

Know Brisbane through the Collection / Read more about the Australian Collection / Subscribe to QAGOMA YouTube to go behind-the-scenes

Specially curated for the Queensland Art Gallery by the Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid, ‘Portrait of Spain: Masterpieces from the Prado’ is the largest and most significant international loan the Prado has ever undertaken, and the first exhibition from their collection to be shown in the Southern Hemisphere / Queensland Art Gallery / 21 July – 4 November 2012

#QAGOMA

Genesis of the Queensland Art Gallery

 

From modest beginnings in 1895, the Queensland Art Gallery celebrates 30 years at South Bank on 21 June 2012, its first permanent home after a series of temporary premises. This is the story of providing for the needs of the people of Queensland in all aspects of the visual arts.

Robin Gibson Queensland Art Gallery
Queensland Art Gallery at South Bank, June 1982 / Collection: QAGOMA Research Library

December 23, 1968, was a fateful day in the cultural history of Queensland. On that day, a submission on inadequacies of art gallery facilities in relation to the cultural needs of the state were presented by the Gallery Trustees to the Minister for Cultural Activities.

This submission, compiled after decades of recognising the need for an art gallery, was the genesis of the Queensland Art Gallery today. It culminated many years of moves to have the gallery built.

At last the dreams of the art enthusiasts of Queensland looked like becoming a reality.

This became even more apparent on the next fateful day — 14 January 1969. On that day State Cabinet decided to appoint a committee to select a site for the new Queensland Art Gallery.

This was refreshing, stimulating news.

For decades it had been apparent that the existing art gallery facilities were inadequate, outmoded. There had been much talk about building a new gallery. Nothing more. But in 1969, with the appointment of the site selection committee the State Government took a giant, decisive cultural step.

The choice of a site narrowed to three — the area once proposed for a Catholic Cathedral in Ann Street, next to Centenary Park; the site then occupied by a Tramways Department Depot in Coronation Drive; land on the South Bank of the river next to Victoria Bridge.

Site for the new Queensland Art Gallery, South Bank, 16 March 1976 / Collection: QAGOMA Research Library

After an in-depth investigation by an inter-departmental committee the riverside site on the South Bank was the choice. State Cabinet approved this decision and acquisition of the land began. On 28 July 1971, a steering committee for the new Art Gallery project was established.

The then Assistant Director of the Queensland Art Gallery, Mr Raoul Mellish, undertook a study tour to the United States and Europe as part of the 1973 Churchill Fellowship. The basic purpose of this tour was to gather data in selected various overseas art galleries in relation to the requirements of the proposed Queensland Art Gallery.

While overseas he established contacts with internationally recognised experts in various specialised fields of art gallery operation. This report presented to the Steering Committee on 10 January 1974, contains information on all aspects of Art Gallery planning.

Eight months after its formation the Steering Committee had completed a comprehensive and detailed report and brief which was submitted to State Cabinet. After decades of inaction, the culturally refreshing move towards building a new Queensland Art Gallery quickened pace. Only five days after receiving the committee’s report and brief, Cabinet approved it.

The report included the idea that the architect for the new gallery should be selected by a two-stage competition. The architects were then invited to submit entries. From the 10 entrants three were invited to participate in the Second Stage of the competition. They were: Bligh, Jessup, Bretnall and Partners Pty Ltd; Robin Gibson and Partners; Lund, Newell, Paulsen Pty Ltd.

On 16 March 1973, the winner — Robin Gibson and Partners — was announced. The assessors described the winner: “The winning design exhibits great clarity and simplicity of concept and relates admirably to the environment and site.”

By now the prospect of a new Queensland Art Gallery was exciting the state’s art lovers. But more stimulating news was to come. On 8 November 1974, State Cabinet decided that a Cultural Centre comprising the Art Gallery, the State Library, the Queensland Museum and a Performing Arts Centre should be built on the riverbank site.

With an alacrity that would have amazed the Art Gallery enthusiasts of a few decades previously, State Cabinet, on 14 January 1975, approved the appointment of a Cultural Centre Planning and Establishment Committee.

Soon the riverbank site was cleared of old buildings by the wreckers and bulldozers and the site was prepared for the greatest advance in Queensland’s cultural history.

Early in 1977 the first section of Stage One was completed at a cost of $1.5 million. This included the spectacular Queen Elizabeth Silver Jubilee Fountain in the river, riverbank rock walls and landscaping, access pontoon and walkways.

This section was officially opened by Queen Elizabeth on 11 March 1977.

Queen Elizabeth II at the Queensland Art Gallery South Bank site, 11 March 1977 to activate the Silver Jubilee Fountain / Collection: QAGOMA Research Library
The Queen Elizabeth II Silver Jubilee Fountain celebrations at the Queensland Art Gallery South Bank site, 11 March 1977 / Collection: QAGOMA Research Library

On 11 August 1978, the art lovers of Queensland had good cause to rejoice. On that day a $19.1 million contract to build the new Queensland Art Gallery was signed. At last a world-ranking art gallery of which Queensland could be immensely proud was on the way.

Decades of procrastination had become a forgettable shadow of the past. Soon after the contract signing the South Bank of the river next to Victoria Bridge became alive with the roar and clatter of the builders.

It was an exhilarating development in Queensland’s history. Now the Queensland Art Gallery not only provides an inspiring centre for people to visit, it also lifts Brisbane’s and Queensland’s prestige throughout the world.

Construction of the Queensland Art Gallery at South Bank began August 1978, with site construction at 11 June 1979 / Collection: QAGOMA Research Library
Queensland Art Gallery, South Bank and surrounding South Brisbane, 15 June 1982 / BCC-B120-7876 / Courtesy: Brisbane City Council
Queensland Art Gallery, South Bank and surrounding South Brisbane, 15 June 1982 / BCC-B120-7879 / Courtesy: Brisbane City Council

Extract from the publication Queensland Art Gallery presented by The Courier Mail and published for the official opening of the Queensland Art Gallery’s new permanent home at South Bank on 21 June 1982.

#QAGOMA

People are the pulse, the breath, the life of the Queensland Art Gallery

 

People. Boilermakers, housewives, bus drivers, dressmakers, clerks, students, typists, children, teachers. People are the pulse, the breath of the Art Gallery.

Their presence, their interest, their movement make the building live.

The Art Gallery is not designed merely as a vast repository of paintings and sculptures. Every metre within its halls projects a quality of space, of light.

The atmosphere of the city flows into it. Even the environs provide a fascinating art study — the planes and angles of the city as seen through the windows on the river side  — the arcs and sweeps of the hills and the Merivale Bridge as seen through the western windows.

This is the feeling of the Art Gallery. It is an extension of the life of the city and certainly not a remote, stiffly compartmented art storage.

People give it life and soul. Their presence, their movement provide a kinetic effect.

This is an Art Gallery with an appeal to every Queenslander. It offers a rich collection of art displayed in exceptionally fine surroundings. It heralds a stimulating era in Queensland culture.

Most importantly, it belongs to the people in substance and in lore.

The Art Gallery is yours. Enjoy it.

Queensland Art Gallery, June 1982 / Collection: QAGOMA Research Library

The Queensland Art Gallery celebrates its 30th anniversary at our South Bank site on 21 June 2012. The current building — the first stage of the Queensland Cultural Centre — was officially opened in 1982 at a cost of $28 million and was designed by renowned Queensland architect Robin Gibson. The building was awarded the Sir Zelman Cowen Award for Architecture in 1982.

The move to the Queensland Art Gallery’s first permanent home took place in three stages, and all sections occupied the building at South Bank, South Brisbane by 8 March with the transfer of the Collection completed by 13 May 1982.

On 21 June, the new building was officially opened. The official opening ceremony was attended by over 900 guests and an estimated 8,000 visitors attended the gala public opening celebrations that evening, as we opened to the public in our first permanent home after some eighty-seven years.

The public response to the opening was overwhelming, with approximately 50,000 visitors in its first 10 days. In its opening year, the Queensland Art Gallery had over 850,000 visitors.

For the opening, works from the Gallery’s Collection were on display, as well as five major international exhibitions drawn from important art museums in the United States, Japan and Britain, these were ‘Japan – Masterpieces from the Idemitsu Museum of Arts, Tokyo’; ‘Kandinsky’ on loan from the Guggenheim Museum, New York; ‘Town, Country, Shore and Sea: British Drawings and Watercolours from Van Dyck to Nash’ from the Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge; ‘Renaissance Bronzes’ from the Victoria and Albert Museum, London and ‘Renaissance Bronzes and Related Drawings’ from the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford; and ‘The World of Edward Hopper’ from the Whitney Museum of American Art, New York.

Transcript from the publication ‘Queensland Art Gallery’ presented by The Courier Mail and published for the official opening of the Queensland Art Gallery’s new permanent home at South Bank on 21 June 1982

Queensland Art Gallery’s new permanent home at South Bank, June 1982 / Collection: QAGOMA Research Library

#QAGOMA